If you live anywhere near the Stadium District or the North Slope, you’ve seen the home(s) being built at the corner of North 4th and I Street. The lot has been empty for years. All of a sudden, it’s a fairly large multi-family townhome. Well, here’s your opportunity to learn more:
Superbly appropriate architecture for the historic district. 2,400 square foot condo with 3 Beds, 3.5 Baths, Great Rm, Dining, Den and a top floor Rec Room with Commencement Bay & Browns Pt view through windows & French Doors to the covered Deck. 2-Car underground private garage & storage. Impressive Master Suite. Youll enjoy the slab granite, imported hardwoods, stainless appliances, tile baths & very high tech connectivity… all done by a million dollar builder!
Priced at $479k. Enough people have emailed me about this project in the last few months that… I think I’ll remain quiet.
Update: I know you like photos –


Listed with Coldwell Banker, but I can’t find it on their site yet.
Here’s Windermere
Commenting Is Closed
Comments are allowed for two weeks from the posted date. If you want to make a comment or reopen this discussion, please contact us with your request. Thank you for visiting.

I’m familiar with this project, but I’m much hungrier for details about the new five-story building at 1st and Tacoma. No one seems to know what’s going on there. I’m happy to see that site put to a higher and better use; I think that if the Stadium district wants to really be successful, it needs to finally replace those faux-Bavarian one-story commercial buildings along Tacoma with some density. Same for the other side of the street.
1 | Posted by drizell | Apr 11, 07:30 AM
I have never understood why someone would pay so much money to live, esentially, in an apartment. Granted you get the tax benefits of home ownership but you still have neighbors a thin 6 inch wall away!
2 | Posted by Janine | Apr 11, 09:58 AM
Janine,
Many of the new condo / townhome projects use materials superior to those used in apartment buildings. I live in a new townhome which utilizes double wall unit separation, drywalled on the inside w/ soundboard between. I get virtually no sound transfer from my neighbors.
3 | Posted by Gorman | Apr 11, 10:25 AM
Most apartments, if not all, that are being built now are of condo quality so they can easily be converted down the road.
4 | Posted by Jake | Apr 11, 10:30 AM
And in the case of this condo, who could resist the proximity to The Parkway?
5 | Posted by Coco | Apr 11, 11:00 AM
But…it’s…superbly appropriate!
Never mind that it costs more than a number of houses a block or two away. That sort of thinking is for people lacking Vision.
7 | Posted by Erik S | Apr 11, 01:43 PM
There were a few new construction homes built in the neighborhood that sold in the mid to upper $300k about a year ago. Those homes were only about 1600 sqft.
The condos seem priced right when you consider their size. Now if they are including garage sqft in the total (which they shouldn’t be) then that is another story.
Drove by the site and saw the building a couple of days ago. It’s the same building plan someone is using throughout their subdivision at the south end of Spanaway. “Superbly appropriate architecture” for all of Pierce County I guess.
10 | Posted by DavidS | Apr 12, 06:47 AM
Ugh. Just who is deciding what is “superbly appropriate” for Tacoma, anyway? Probably some King County developer…
I just now realized the irony in that label, “superbly appropriate.” What are they trying to tell us?
I have to say it’s fairly inappropriate, considering our bigger vision, but my taste in architecture tends to stray away from Morgan’s line of Starbucks paints…
11 | Posted by laura s. | Apr 12, 08:50 AM
Krause construction strikes again! This is what happens when a builders whim isn’t tempered by a tempered by a clients vision.
12 | Posted by Hill Top Guy | Apr 12, 10:38 AM
I won’t say it doesn’t fit the neighborhood, but I recall from my driveby that the front door is at a 45-degree angle to the street front. I can’t think of another home in the area with front doors 45-degrees to the street.
This is not a big deal. I don’t think houses need to look the same to fit the neighborhood. This home strikes me as a caricature of the neighborhood.
The starting point for the layout of this home was to maximize the building volume. Then some cute curved windows were carved out. People like octagon windows so let’s put a couple of those in. Oh, and we should add a porch, but not enough to be useable because then we’d have to shrink our building footprint. We can carve these things out of the blank first floor of the front.
Since I’m not buying it anyhow, I don’t care too much about how it looks, I just hope this is not what passed for historic architecture in Tacoma these days. Actually another hope is that the front facade gets some more ornament to distract from its uninteresting bulk.
(This isn’t directed only at this project, just a general frustration that fakeries of certain periods seem to more socially acceptable than quality design of other periods. I also seem to be a bit snarky lately.)
14 | Posted by DavidS | Apr 12, 12:52 PM
That is one ugly structure, I hope they didn’t spend to much on the guy that designed this abomination. Maybe this is what you get if you use shareware home design software and don’t pay for your registration. The horror, the horror.
15 | Posted by Crenshaw Sepulveda | Apr 12, 02:44 PM
Superbly appropriate architecture for the historic district? What has the writer been smoking? I think we have found the answer to Tacoma’s problems, as I see them, the people doing the planning and selling are on some bad news drugs. Superbly appropriate? Oh my god, I refuse to believe this was written with a straight face. Seriously, where do they get this level of copy writing, I suspect it would be very close to the barn yard. I do feel sorry for the real estate agents that will be trying to sell this abomination, but maybe, with writing like “superbly appropriate” they get what they deserve.
17 | Posted by Crenshaw Sepulveda | Apr 12, 03:04 PM
sorry folks but there hasn’t been anything new and exciting built in Tacoma for years…all the yuppie condos/noodle bars are stupid and will be passe in 5 mins. So who cares if some trust-fund/stock market/real estate nouveau riche buys in to TTown….I was in the trades for years…it aint that hard to build a nice respectful Vic/Edw style home….and that new condo on Yak/I street is TTown perfect…sadly….
declasse and pretentious for no reason at all….
18 | Posted by Violet Vodka | Apr 12, 05:37 PM
The condos at 6th and St. Helens, while done in a faux “Seattle” style, are quite fetching http://www.triangle-townhomes.com/default.htm . I guess we could import some Seattle design. I guess I like the design of the Triangle Townhomes. I like the planned conversion of the old Mecca theater. They are rehabbing what was an unused and defunct hotel into condos and apparently a sports bar and some retail. Good project in my book. Keep some of the old, don’t displace anyone, create some employment opportunities, it is all good. If I had the dough I’d buy into the Triangle, to be sure, or the Mecca project. Some of the conversions, formerly commercial structures, into condos are interesting. I tend to think they are fairly benign in terms of impacting people other that those that may have lost jobs when the building went from commercial to residential. The conversion of the Old City Hall is a great project, out of my league in terms of cost, but I like what they have planned to a great extent. 600k for a 1200 square foot one bed room with a view of the colonial apartments has got to be insane, but I’m sure they will sell it. I hated to see the Walker and the Ansonia go condo but I think they will be good additions to the condo landscape. The Marcato is an abomination, it’s greatest selling feature is apparently its state of the art moisture detection system, very sexy, I must say. I’m sure that some of the soon to be shut down schools will end up as condos and I think they will be good additions to the landscape. The big enchilada I’m waiting for is for the city to sell the Medical Arts (Municipal) Building to some developer to convert into condos. You know it will happen, it is just a question of when. I’ve got nothing against condos, I’m primarily an urbanite. I see the value of ownership in a neighborhood even if the neighborhood is comprised primarily of flats. I do want to see lower income people provided for, I want to see diversity in my neighborhoods. I like mixed use. I like public parks and green spaces. I like street life, night life, and the good life. I want it all, to be sure, but I want all to be able to share in it. I’m a terrible person.
20 | Posted by Crenshaw Sepulveda | Apr 12, 08:29 PM
I vote with Janine – I’ll keep my 4 walls separate from anyone elses. I don’t see the same character in this building as I do even in the homes adjacent. Maybe all of the superbly appropriate architecture is on the interior. I just have to ask though…the rest of the homes in the area have survived 100 or so years. What is this building going to look like when it’s 100?
21 | Posted by M.W. | Apr 13, 06:00 AM
A little reality check for the condo-crazed. In order to reasonably afford a $300K mortgage you need to be pulling in $100K annually. A $500K mortgage would require a significantly higher salary.
Where are all these wealthy folks who are clamoring to live in Tacoma condos?
22 | Posted by beerBoy | Apr 13, 06:30 AM
So the design is not groundbreaking but the structure is superbly appropriate for the n’hood: it is multidwelling and has that similar boxy design we see here and there around town. Gee, it’s across from a brick apt building on a busy street, I don’t expect a lot. Anyone notice how the place was rain-soaked forever AND THEN in about 2 days they put the “housewrap” (in separate pieces) and siding on? Hope the million-dollar builder dried it from the inside before doing interior.
23 | Posted by tea | Apr 16, 12:15 PM
If anyone takes a look at the apartment building on South 7th and Yakima (at the Yakima/I Street transition) that building and the one we are talking about here have a lot of similar features. So maybe it is a bit taller (fyi new 2 story houses are usually taller now then they were in 1908)then the home next door but it still fits in.
If anyone takes a look at the apartment building on South 7th and Yakima (at the Yakima/I Street transition) that building and the one we are talking about here have a lot of similar features. So maybe it is a bit taller (fyi new 3 story houses are usually taller now then they were in 1908)then the home next door but it still fits in.
Gee, it’s across from a brick apt building on a busy street, I don’t expect a lot.
Well, that’s rich. I certainly don’t understand what the apartment building and a busy street have to do with explaining this Kent-esque construction in our fair city?!
FYI, across the other street (I St.) are some very interesting, colorful old Victorians, on not one, but both sides of 4th Street.
27 | Posted by laura s. | Apr 16, 01:21 PM
For the record, I’d have put some extremely contemporary, sleek-lined building there, so it didn’t appear as though it was ‘trying’ to even look quasi-Victorian.
And Mr. Sepulveda , those can be built economically…for those readers who may think we’re all architectural snobs.
28 | Posted by laura s. | Apr 16, 01:28 PM
Symmetry, but no balance. Gotta love the white-plastic windows. Ugh.
29 | Posted by Dave L. | Apr 16, 02:39 PM
Frank Lloyd Wright designed a house for his first wife. It was between two Victorians. When asked why he would build a house like his between two Victorias he replied “because they wouldn’t tear them down”. He goes on to say that the views inside the house are designed so that you don’t see the Victorians. There are a lot of places I would consider spending 479k on long before I considered this development. I really feel sorry for the neighbors that have to look at this abomination on a daily basis.
30 | Posted by Crenshaw Sepulveda | Apr 16, 08:47 PM
Commenting is closed for this article.