Exit133 is about Tacoma. It's about Real Estate, Politics, the Arts, Urban Development, and the interests of our readers.
Emergency Food Network
is looking for a Fiscal / Operations Manager
General : We Like The Photos

ThriceAllAmerican wants to remind you that tonight’s city council meeting will consider the traffic direction changes in the Theater District – the one way St. Helens being the most contentious part of the discussion.
More importantly, we really liked the photomosaic of the Bostwick building using bicycling related photos. Simply sweet, Jamie.
Link to ThriceAllAmerican
Previously on Exit133
Link | Posted on 15. May 2007, 08:46
Commenting Is Closed
Comments are allowed for two weeks from the posted date. If you want to make a comment or reopen this discussion, please contact us with your request. Thank you for visiting.
Also nice letter to the editor by Jamie:
http://www.thenewstribune.com/468/story/58037.html
One-way to the 705 on ramp just encourages people to use it as a cut through when escaping downtown.
1 | Posted by DavidS | May 15, 10:18 AM
The road could have remained two way. Given the one way alternatives, this was the better result. Plus, around 80 percent of the people using St. Helens use it southbound already. Traffic directions should be set how people normally want to use them. Thus, little is going to change.
Making it one way northbound would have placed a Do Not Enter sign at the traditional entrance to downtown as councilmember Bill Evans called it.
Given the choice between facilitating people to come into the central business district easier or to leave quicker, I am glad the priority is on enhancing people to enter downtown. Downtown Tacoma is one of the easiest one to leave already with all of the freeway entrances.
Finally, I don’t know of hardly anyone who likes reverse angle parking. The proposal on the table will allow people to park normally front end angled. Also, more on-street parking spaces will be made available though the present configuration.
2 | Posted by Erik B. | May 15, 10:56 AM
Regarding reverse angle parking, it’s a good thing. Seattle studied back-in angle parking v. front-in angle parking. The City of Seattle’s study found that back-in has about 30% less accidents and causes less traffic congestion. This is primarily a result of pedestrian orientation and driver visibility.
For more on back-in parking (i.e. a north-bound St. Helens Street) see:
The study from Pottstown, PA
or
some other general blog comments
I’m not sure I understand how a south bound St. Helens getting people to the 9th Street entrance of 705 enhances downtown.
3 | Posted by DavidS | May 15, 12:08 PM
I dont know about anybody else, but I still plan on riding up St Helens. Ill be damned if Im going to start going up Broadway or Stadium Way.
This is just another example of the city catering to potential Tacomans, rather than catering to the ones that have been here for years.
You know why its easy to get out of downtown? Because there isnt much keeping people there. Its not as if the street layouts prevent people from going downtown all the time.
4 | Posted by Tacoma (A)roma | May 15, 12:11 PM
I’m not sure I understand how a south bound St. Helens getting people to the 9th Street entrance of 705 enhances downtown
The Broadway Center Board of Trustees opposed turning the street into one way north direction because they concluded it would deter people from coming into the area.
The Tacoma Downtown Merchants also opposed conversion to a one way north direction as many of their customers travel to downtown using St. Helens southbound from many areas of the city.
5 | Posted by Erik B. | May 15, 12:24 PM
Surely we give drivers enough credit to understand that turning left on 9th is just as easy. I’m not sure I buy that someone looking to go to the Theater District will get distracted elsewhere and suddenly never make it.
I understand the concerns of the BCPA and the merchants, but a one-way only southbound street feels very dangerous for pedestrians and for parkers. If you’ve ever stood there and watched drivers barrel down St. Helens from Stadium then veer left and then race St. Helens trying to make the 9th St light, you’ll know that people are really gunning it there. And my hunch is most of them aren’t looking to stay but they’re going toward the freeway.
6 | Posted by Erik Hanberg | May 15, 01:14 PM
it would deter people from coming into the area
Asking someone to drive an extra 200 feet does not deter people from their destination. (But with everything you’ve said about parking you already know this.)
Making the Broadway/St. Helens/9th Street intersection even more a traffic snarl would encourage people to go around the intersection. A south bound only St. Helens gives this intersection 5 points of entry and only 4 points of exit – each of which has a pedestrian crosswalk.
People currently aren’t zipping out of downtown on St. Helens and still wouldn’t be able to due to yield issues. I don’t see cars speeding out of town on Broadway today where it is one-way north bound. This “people will escape downtown” if we make St. Helens one-way up hill is a straw argument with no data to support it.
7 | Posted by DavidS | May 15, 01:25 PM
and then race St. Helens trying to make the 9th St light, you’ll know that people are really gunning it there.
If you watch the mid-intersection crossing between the Bostwick and the Pantages plaza (does it have a name?) you’ve probably also seen a number of these same drivers trying to take out pedestrians. If this becomes one-way southbound this will become more of a problem and we will likely loose the mid-intersection crossing for pedestrians. It’s sad when our pedestrian connectivity begins to disappear in a downtown.
(sorry for the consecutive posts)
8 | Posted by DavidS | May 15, 01:30 PM
Being a resident of St. Helens (no, I’m not that homeless woman that hangs around at Tully’s yelling at people) I believe that making the street one way will have unintended consequences. I think because the street is two way it mitigates some of the bad driving behavior because more care and caution has to be exercised when driving on that stretch of St. Helens. I don’t think it is possible to have adequate signage indicating it is one way when approaching from east or west bound 9th. The whole thing is just an accident waiting to happen. St. Helens may not be great, but there is no way to fix it. This is not a case of if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, but rather it is broke but there are no really good solutions. As time goes on the area will even become more congested but it is my hope that people eschew the cars and walk or bike into the area. We’re only talking a couple of yards away from the Link stop, park at the Tacoma Dome station and hang out a while on St. Helens.
9 | Posted by Crenshaw Sepulveda | May 15, 03:18 PM
I used to live in the Bostwick overlooking Broadway. I saw a whole bunch of people driving the wrong way on Broadway. Broadway is literally a broad way, so it’s not as dangerous, but a driver getting confused from 9th and going uphill is bad news. I’d rather see it one-way northbound, but I’m with crenshaw that the two-way is better than southbound.
10 | Posted by Erik Hanberg | May 15, 03:53 PM
The merchants did not chose “One Way South” as the best option, only the better options of one way. they would like to see it stay a two way first. I guess there weren’t many bicyclists at all of those meetings, cause this is the first time I’ve heard any of you speak out. There are many issues here, and someone will end up not liking the decision.
*One way north has the less parking than south, proposes perception of funneling out of downtown, against the grain of what 75% of people drive now, back in angled parking, also a left turn onto Market.
*One way south has the most parking, creates continuous flow down Broadway which becomes one-way south at 11th.,brings people into downtown which they are used to, challenges at 9th with the downhill speed and rushing to the freeway.
*Two way has the least parking pretty much is what seems to change here.
Now if the street went one way in Either direction, wouldn’t that ideally leave room for a bike lane??? Isn’t Broadway to Stadium a much more gradual route?? I don’t bike cause I’m lazy and impatient so I wouldn’t know. We do have to consider these alternate modes of travel though. Thanks for sharing.
11 | Posted by Penelope | May 16, 11:09 AM
Broadway is a more gradual hill I’ll agree, but the road is in much worse shape. St Helens also has a much wider road area, so you aren’t playing chicken with oncoming cars.
12 | Posted by Tacoma (A)roma | May 16, 11:24 AM
Broadway is actually too gradual — it doesn’t climb much, so for those of us heading up to the 6th Ave/North Slope area, it doesn’t allow you to make much headway. The nice thing about St. Helens is that it gets you uphill, but at a reasonable grade.
13 | Posted by michael g. | May 16, 12:58 PM
I actually am not a big fan of bike lanes, in general. They tend to have lots of debris since no one drives in them, and only give the illusion of safety (vehicles may block, opening car doors are a hazard, etc.). In other words, the way it is now works fine.
Also, somewhat unrelated, for NB vs. SB, how does a different direction of travel equate to less parking? That just sounds wacky to me.
Oh, and the reason that the bicyclists were late to the game in commenting is that people just didn’t know about what was going on. TWBC did not appear to be aware of the changes until I contacted them, and the TNT didn’t even print anything about this until Monday. All of this was well after the public meetings held by the city AND the council committee hearing. Not all interested parties were made aware, so by and large the only people that showed up were BCPA and Downtown Merchants.
14 | Posted by jamie from thriceallamerican | May 16, 01:42 PM
Does anybody else ever wonder about not having cars go any direction on St Helens?
Sometimes when theres a debate concerning parking, traffic density, traffic flow etc..it makes think how nice it would be to have a small section of downtown car-free.
15 | Posted by Tacoma (A)roma | May 16, 03:08 PM
I think that actually did come up in another thread related to this issue. Unfortunately, there is not a good track record for such things in the past (Broadway used to be closed between 11th and 13th, and apparently that block turned into a ghost town). It’s nice to think it could be made to work, but there would be a lot of skepticism. Especially over the loss of parking, of course…
(Random idea: what if there were a year-round street market on the block?)
16 | Posted by jamie from thriceallamerican | May 16, 03:29 PM
Previously discussion of this can be found here.
I was actually keeping an eye on this for some time. It was going northbound until last month when the direction was flipped in committee.
17 | Posted by DavidS | May 16, 03:56 PM
I was thinking the same thing about a market on that block. Maybe a hybrid of a farmers’ market and Portland’s food cart “district,” (near Stark and Broadway) which has an incredible variety of cheap good food. I think people might be up for walking a block or three to access that sort of thing, especially given the need for better places to grab lunch downtown.
18 | Posted by michael g. | May 16, 04:00 PM
I think the most likely choice for a pedestrian-only zone would be Opera Alley. Or you could do a system where it’s pedestrian only after 10 am, for example, to allow for deliveries and business as needed.
19 | Posted by Erik Hanberg | May 16, 04:07 PM
Does anybody else ever wonder about not having cars go any direction on St Helens?
As mentioned, that was tried on Broadway when the Tacoma Financial Center was built. In fact, there is a “artist rendition” of the Financial Center and Broadway at the time with lots of people on it. The reality was it impeded the area for businesses and set downtown back.
From what I have read cutting off traffic to a street completely usually has a bad result unless there is a major event like a farmers market or 6th Avenue event. Pike Place Market still allows cars in front of it even though they have 1000 times the pedestrian traffic of anywhere in Tacoma.
No doubt this issue will be re-visited when the UWT wants to close streets by them.
20 | Posted by Erik B. | May 16, 04:10 PM
I say that they should allow cars to drive on St. Helens but not park on St. Helens. Use the space taken up by cars parking for more interesting uses. Some more trees, some public seating, room for street vendors. If we can convert the space devoted to parking on St. Helens we might just have the right mix. I know there are those saying, Crenshaw you’re crazy (like i haven’t heard that before) but give it some thought. The main failure of the pedestrian Broadway Plaza I believe was that traffic could not flow through it, not that cars couldn’t park there. Cars will always find a place to park but sometimes it is appropriate to stop in front of a store and let people out of the car or maybe load the car.
21 | Posted by Crenshaw Sepulveda | May 16, 11:17 PM
Commenting is closed for this article.