So, after some consideration and feedback, the city has decided to NOT add bike lanes to Center Street. From the email sent to the many folks that provided input on the issue from the City:
...Due to Center Street being an industrial corridor with high traffic and a need for a left turn lane, the City at this time will not be installing bike lanes. However, as stated in our meeting, providing a safe environment for our bicycling community is a huge priority for the City. Therefore, we will be striping a fog line on the north side of Center Street (approximately 3 feet from the curb) to help move traffic away from the curb to help provide an area for bicyclists. The result will be narrower lanes for through traffic (still meeting standards for roadway widths) and a continuous turn-pocket.
In addition, we will be following through with the suggestion to begin installing signs stating something like “Share the Road” to help bring awareness to motorist that bicyclists use the road also.
Previously on Exit133
Commenting Is Closed
Comments are allowed for two weeks from the posted date. If you want to make a comment or reopen this discussion, please contact us with your request. Thank you for visiting.

“Therefore, we will be striping a fog line on the north side of Center Street (approximately 3 feet from the curb) to help move traffic away from the curb to help provide an area for bicyclists.”
An area for bicyclists full of dirt, sand, broken glass, and garbage? Sweet!
1 | Posted by jamie from thriceallamerican | Jul 9, 09:33 AM
Wow, that’s pretty sad. So neither South Tacoma Way nor Center will have bike lanes? Too bad since both are such a great way to get from downtown to the south end.
2 | Posted by KevinFreitas | Jul 9, 09:39 AM
Can’t we turn an abandoned rail line into a bike lane? What about that one that runs through UWT?
3 | Posted by snoopy | Jul 9, 10:04 AM
I believe the Water Ditch Trail runs approximately parallel to South Tacoma Way from Downtown down to 80-something-th… I think the bike-trail visionaries out there envision it connecting to the old tracks that go through the UWT campus, as well as (somehow) hooking up to other trails such as the Scott Pierson trail along Hwy 16. So hopefully that will help fill the need for providing a route between Downtown and South Tacoma. Now if they’d just hurry up and start…
4 | Posted by jamie from thriceallamerican | Jul 9, 10:26 AM
South Tacoma Way should have a bike lane within the next three years, so we were told by city staff. Though not perfect, fog lanes supposedly slow trafic and that is better then nothing. It seems to me the city is not opposed to bike lanes, but they are hard to justify if the bike commuter community remains small. Only a handful of bicycle enthusiasts showed up at the meeting regarding striping Center Street. About the same number of business owners along Center Street were present.
“providing a safe environment for our bicycling community is a huge priority for the City”
But, we’re not actually going to provide you with one…
6 | Posted by michael | Jul 9, 11:12 AM
I think this points out why our city needs to invest more in developing its non-motorized transportation infrastructure. (Read: hire a full-time coordinator.) Simultaneously, there is discussion of bike lanes on Center Street, bike lanes on South Tacoma Way, and a dedicated bike trail that runs parallel to both roads. It doesn’t take a genius to see that instead of taking a piecemeal approach, we need to look—big-picture—at which areas are already well-served by bike lanes/trails (if indeed there are any) and which are not, and determine how we can design a system of bike lanes that can actually help someone get from point A to point B. And saying that it’s a chicken/egg thing isn’t good enough—people are actually choosing NOT to ride their bikes because of the lack of amenities, and the only way to really increase the number of people commuting by bike is to provide them better routes in all portions of the city.
7 | Posted by jamie from thriceallamerican | Jul 9, 11:21 AM
I think the bike-trail visionaries out there envision it connecting to the old tracks that go through the UWT campus
I agree.
I hope Tacoma will take a look at Rails to Trails program as other cities have. Tacoma has a ton of easements and surplus land out there.
The proposed Water Ditch Trail will accomplish most of the connection lost by not pursuing Center Street. One of the highlights of the Regional Transportation Investment District Proposal going to the voters this fall will be money to help complete Water Ditch Trail and the connection between Tacoma and Puyallup.
9 | Posted by Tim Farrell | Jul 9, 01:26 PM
Here’s a video on Physically Separated Bike Lanes
The cool thing on some of their examples is that you don’t have to remove on-street parking, they are just re-ordered.
I attended the meeting and actually came away with a very positive feeling. I think they ARE looking at the big picture – that’s why they are not putting lanes in on both Center St. and S Tacoma Way. They are comitted to making it all connect. S. Tacoma Way and the Water Ditch Trail are already a part of that plan. I’m optomistic.
I also felt the business owners at the meeting had a good point. Removing the center turn lanes would actually make it more dangerous for bikes because of the large volume of trucks. Without the turn lane, the trucks stop in the lane of traffic and tempt cars to pass them on the right in the bike lane.
I would encourage more cyclists to join us at the next meeting.
11 | Posted by Kristina | Jul 9, 04:00 PM
Once Tacoma has a sincere Critical Mass, and if those same bicyclists were also patrons of the businesses in question, then Tacomans might begin to fashion their fair city like those towns with populations under 200,000 — see this link I found for comparative purposes: http://www.funtrails.org/urban21.htm — my old hometown of Anchorage, AK, made the list! What makes Tacoma different from those smaller towns, you ask? It looks like the deciding factor is a large, typically state, university…
12 | Posted by pungentsmells | Jul 9, 04:53 PM
There currently is a prelim plan for a LID on MLK that will have bike lanes from 25th to Division. I am hoping that we can also get the Scott Pierson trail to also connect with this. Spread the word this is a very real possibility
13 | Posted by Eric | Jul 10, 01:01 PM
Couple of thoughts:
Re: Councilman Farrel @9, I like that we’re finding money for Water Ditch, but I’m definitely concerned that it is part of the RTID, which I fear is doomed due to things such as the Cross-Base Highway and the ill-advised pairing with Sound Transit Phase 2. Despite the benefits I’d like to see in better bike trails, light rail expansion, etc., I’m inclined to vote no on RTID on account of the Cross-Base Highway. The RTID/ST2 pairing may effectively doom both packages since I think a lot of people will vote “yes” on only one…
re: Eric @13, that’s a long stretch of road, definitely exciting that it is part of the package. And 25th/MLK isn’t too far from the end of Scott Pierson…
14 | Posted by jamie from thriceallamerican | Jul 10, 02:33 PM
I’m gonna hold my nose and vote for the RTID. I think it’s got more good (including the bike trail, which I didn’t know about till now) than bad in it, and the cross-base now must go through mediation with enviros before it’s built, which should either delay it to death or lead to substantial mitigation.
15 | Posted by mig | Jul 10, 02:58 PM
The Street Films has some pretty good videos on design of city streets, pricing parking and a ton on bicycles, and traffic calming.
They also explain the traffic calming device of a Diagonal Diverter.
First time I have heard of it. Looks pretty cool. It lets bicycles and pedestrians through but “diverts” cars.
Commenting is closed for this article.