The Changing Sixth Avenue (20. August 2007, 07:42 by Derek Young) ~ We Don't Have The Answers

The News Tribune has a piece this morning on the the changing face of Sixth Avenue. It used to be a pretty sleepy commercial district wedged the North End and Central Tacoma. We remember thrift stores where Il Fiasco used to be… and the liquor store where Schucks… nevermind. Now it’s our most vibrant nightlife area. Unfortunately, not everybody is happy with the change. Parking is more difficult. People are on the streets much later. The noise is greater. We’ve heard this complaint in other neighborhoods too.

The question we ask is whether it’s possible to appease all the stakeholders? Or, is residential use immediately adjacent to a nightlife district simply incompatible? If that’s the case, where does it go from here? Times change. Time to move? ... Or is it time to clamp down on the businesses? This isn’t going to be pretty.

Link to The News Tribune

Previously on Exit133 – You remember this one, don’t you?

Commenting Is Closed
Comments are allowed for two weeks from the posted date. If you want to make a comment or reopen this discussion, please contact us with your request. Thank you for visiting.

#

Times will change and I think there are plenty of people who will/do welcome the chance to live near Sixth Ave. There will be some growing pains, yes, but I think its worth it and a part of a vibrant, active city.

1 | Posted by Kristina | Aug 20, 08:22 AM

I don’t understand the debate on this. State law explicitly indicates that a homeowner has every right and expectation of living in their home in relative peace and quiet. Local governments simply choose to enforce or not. So the city needs to make a choice. Homeowners or drunken revelry. I support business but Jazzbones seems to be very callous towards it’s neighbors, and determined to deflect blame from itself. Public disturbance for profit. That’s not being a responsible business operator. Being in business confers no special right or consideration. Jazzbones could probably tone it down a little, and everybody would be OK, but they probably won’t. They seem pretty tone deaf. That will tick off the locals, causing the hammer of government to swing harder than it needs to.

2 | Posted by Steve | Aug 20, 08:34 AM

It might be more of a nuisance to live by 6th Ave then it used to be, but dollars to donuts it’s the proximity to a very cool district that has increased property values for the residents.

3 | Posted by Erik Hanberg | Aug 20, 08:35 AM

This happens in just about every place that changes. The knee-jerk reaction of long-time homeowners who are experiencing something new is to criticize it. I’m sure nearly everyone that has lived near Sixth Avenue since the 90s now appreciates the ability to take advantage of the area’s amenities that didn’t exist 10 years ago.

I think the neighbors should look at the bigger picture. Would they rather be woken up at night by loud music or by gunshots?

I have found there to be a plethora of parking close to Sixth Avenue at all hours—but not always right in front of one’s house. I think that the residents’ mentality is that it is a God-given right that someone be able to park 10 steps from their front porch. Parking is easy—as long as you’re willing to walk a block. That’s a consequence of living in a popular city neighborhood.

If the residents don’t want to deal with growth issues near Sixth Avenue, there are many other areas of the city where they could go. If they want, they COULD be woken up by gunshots every night, instead of loud music. They wouldn’t have any trouble parking, because in many parts of Tacoma, people park their cars on their front lawns.

The residents are dealing with the shock of change. I say give it a few years, and give the complainants time to adjust to the changes. You can’t always please everyone. Drug dealers and gangsters are nostalgic for the Sixth Avenue of the 90s. There may always be detractors, but the resurgence of Sixth Avenue is not stopping anytime soon.

4 | Posted by drizell | Aug 20, 08:37 AM

I generally agree with Drizell on this one. Change can be tough on long term residents, but clamping down on the development of one of the city’s biggest success stories isn’t the answer. There are plenty of “dead” neighborhoods that are free from the clutter of actual entertainment amenities and other businesses. If someone wants a pastoral lifestyle, they can choose Puyallup, Fircrest, most of the north end, Wapato, etc.

5 | Posted by Erik S | Aug 20, 09:37 AM

I used to live in Fremont, and then Columbia City in Seattle before I relocated to Tacoma. Sure parking and noise, etc, were issues, but we never really thought about it. It was our choice to live near the action.

But, all I can say is I wish my new neighborhood had a quarter of the commercial vibrancy my old digs had.

Tacoma is a city, 6th Avenue is a business district. When I was looking at houses in Tacoma, the existence of the 6th Avenue business strip was the only reason I even considered that area. Most of Tacoma is totally dead in terms of streetlife and commercial character.

A little vomit on the car now and then is annoying, but washes off and beats having it stolen. Maybe park off-street. Like Eric H said, property values in the area benefit directly from the activity in the core.

6 | Posted by jerry garcia | Aug 20, 10:00 AM

Parking is more difficult. People are on the streets much later. The noise is greater. We’ve heard this complaint in other neighborhoods too.

If the city would accept the recommendations of their consultant and extend their 2 hour parking limitation until 10:00 p.m., it would alleviate much of the parking problem there. The North End Neighborhood Council recommended the same thing.

Right now, one can store three of their used cars continuously from 4:00 p.m. Friday unto 10:00 a.m. Monday on 6th Avenue proper. Yet the peak periods for parking occur on Friday and Saturday night.

The city’s 9 to 6 parking enforcement hours are meant for a 9 to 5 workforce.

Right now the city is dropping parking enforcement to zero during the peak demand times on 6th Ave which is causing the place to be unneccesarily jammed.

7 | Posted by Erik B. | Aug 20, 10:36 AM

I live in the middle of the 6th Ave area and I love it here. (except between midnight and 2:00 am)
As I see it – the main problem is liquor over-service. Monday & Thursdays are the worst. Drunks love to scream “whooo hooo”. They often urinate in our yards (men & women), sometimes they vomit on our sidewalks and every once in a blue moon they have sex on the hoods of their cars. We also get a lot of petty acts of theft and vandalism.
If it’s a growing pain it’ll go away, But until then I’ll let the bar owners know that they are over-serving and being bad neighbors.

P.S. I have not heard a gun shot since “The Offbeat” shut down!

8 | Posted by Native | Aug 20, 10:47 AM

I was told by a local commercial real estate consultant that the draw to the district for food and beverage servers is that the property rents are comparatively cheap.

Hear that Downtown Merchants Group?

I don’t see anything special about 6th Avenue that would draw nightclub owners other than low operating expenses, i.e. cheap rent.

It might be the case that these food & drink businesses are serving some of the neighbors within walking distance, but I doubt that many such neighbors alone could support the so-called upscale restaurants.

Just for fun, trying walking either direction off 6th Avenue and have a look at the condition of the neighborhood housing and the kind of cars that are parked around that belong to the residents.

I see a lot of work-a-day kind of people. I’m led to believe that those are the people who are complaining about the sometimes unstable conditions in their front yards.

By the way, do those same neighbors concur with the club owners and their supporters that 6th Avenue is now safer because of the clubs? Is it true that criminals are running scared because of the influx of food & beverage servers?

I don’t see the evidence for that.

I do clearly see the evidence that real estate consultants have contributed to the rise in property rents.

I’m leaving the district after operating a business here for over 17 years.

If I want to stay here on 6th Ave in the same building, I have to sign a lease that charges rent 300% above what I paid in January 2006.

The trouble with greed and those who promote it is that it’s just not a sustainable virtue.

Maybe at some point 6th Avenue was like a calm lake on a sunny day. Then all of a sudden here comes some guy, a big showoff in a charging cigarette boat with a thundering motor and he creates this huge wake and then a few minutes later he’s gone and then everything returns back to normal.

9 | Posted by Mofo from the Hood | Aug 20, 10:53 AM

I would like to see 6th ave embrace the LIFE BLOOD being injected into the area. I would like to see Tacoma mutate into a place more like Ballard.

I attended a Refresh Seattle web design conference in Ballard once and I was awakened to what the hell is missing in Tacoma, which is people out walking around doing stuff in the evening!

You see signs of this on sixth ave and over in proctor.

The fact downtown Tacoma is a dead zone is a tremendous tragedy.

10 | Posted by RR Anderson | Aug 20, 11:02 AM

Mofo said: I don’t see anything special about 6th Avenue that would draw nightclub owners other than low operating expenses, i.e. cheap rent.

The draw is the neighborhood itself, not the rent prices. Bar/club/restaurant owners want to be where people are, and having a happening district where people can choose between a whole ton of places is worth escalating rent prices. The whole street is alive for hours after work and that’s why owners want to move in, not cheap rents.

11 | Posted by Erik Hanberg | Aug 20, 11:11 AM

Seems like everybody wants to make arguements over economics and what’s ‘cool’.
Unfortunatly the LAW trumps coolness. And calling people who have thier entire life invested in a home knee jerk reactionaries is very foolish.

12 | Posted by Steve | Aug 20, 12:10 PM

by law do you mean the zoning laws? because the zoning along 6th Ave supports ues that are currently the subject of the debate.

13 | Posted by snoopy | Aug 20, 12:21 PM

I’ve lived in the 6th Ave District for 7 years. We love all the cool stuff that’s happening on the Ave, but we have no desire to live in the middle of it anymore. It’s a great place to visit, but a horrible place to try to raise a family. Crowd noise and the parking have never bothered me. But bad, drunk karaoke screams out of E-9 until well after 1am and I get to listen to people swearing, puking, yelling and screaming all weekend long, especially when the weather is good. Our block has had more break-ins and vandalism to vehicles since the whole “upswing” happened as well. On the weekends I often have to clear broken beer bottles and pub glasses out of my yard in the morning (along with those pesky taco bell wrappers) before I can send the kids out to play. The patrons of all the great stuff on 6th could make an effort to respect the residences. It’s great that everyone wants to hang out here, but please use one of those cool artsy garbage cans to pee, puke, and put trash in instead of my front yard. I’ve had enough. My house goes on the market next month.

14 | Posted by Sara Sandefur | Aug 20, 12:53 PM

Sara, the funny thing is the agent will probably market the house as being close to Starbucks, restaurants, and nightlife.

15 | Posted by Jake | Aug 20, 01:05 PM

Anyone want to trade homes? I have the vandals, crime, and beer bottles in my yard; but the closest bar is 12 blocks away!

I don’t get the puke or pee, but I will gladly trade with someone who would like to live near a flourishing population of sex-offenders and meth-cookers.

For you 6th ave’rs, I would make my voice heard at community meetings. Tell the city to provide more patrols and garbage cans. Complain and they will listen, the 6th ave district is important to them (unlike Oakland/Madrona, aka the city dump).

I wish our city would evolve into having more of those neighborhood pockets with good coffee shops, bars, and shops. I would LOVE it!

P.S., the offers to trade houses only holds for the north side of 6th ave. I’ve always wanted to be a northender.

16 | Posted by Christy | Aug 20, 01:39 PM

The residents are dealing with the shock of change. I say give it a few years, and give the complainants time to adjust to the changes.

The fundamental thing to remember is that this is what success looks like. We have enough dead zone failures around Tacoma.

Here on 6th, we have a set of restaurant entrepreneurs that were able to take a number of run down buildings and turn them into a thriving restaurant district. The intensity of all of the places together is what is giving the area life. Now its no longer a trip to a specific restaurant but a trip to the area to see which restaurant has a space open.

Now 6th even has the hot dog place The Red Hot open.

With that said, I am sure they are going to have to be some continual work to have the impact on the surrounding area be reduced. The more the merchants can keep ahead of the problem the better.

17 | Posted by Erik B. | Aug 20, 01:45 PM

I live near a mini-mart, so I get the wrappers, vomit, bottles and cans, drug deals in the alley, inebriates urinating on the sidewalk in broad daylight – all this without the benefit of there actually being a bar anywhere nearby!

Having said this, there is a big difference having a house just a half block off the main strip, versus one that is a block away. Out to Pine Street, there is a core commercial zoning with mixed use residential north and south of that, which is supposed to target density, land use intensity and activities along 6th while protecting SF neighborhoods to the north and south.

In other words, expect more people and activities in that area, not less.

My sister lived for a while right off Broadway on Capitol Hill, and recollecting her experiences, it seems to me that these kinds of problems don’t get solved so much as residents learn to adjust their expectations, or move to quieter surroundings.

18 | Posted by jerry garcia | Aug 20, 01:47 PM

An article appeared in the New York Times several weeks ago lamenting the loss of certain activities (legal and illegal) that contribute to the atmosphere of the city. The argument was that New York City was becoming too suburban, and was losing its edge. Some people live for the street theater that you can find only in major cities.

I understand there are quite a few people who currently live in the Sixth Avenue area that would prefer to live in a soulless place like Bonney Lake. If you can’t handle city living, why are you still here?

19 | Posted by drizell | Aug 20, 02:02 PM

I’m again in with Drizell on this. If Tacoma’s going to become something more than a bedroom community for Seattle/Ft Lewis, it’s going to need some vibrant neighborhood business districts and/or a more thoroughly revitalized downtown. I agree that the customers of the various bars should be able to control themselves better (is this a college proximity problem?) but the development of 6th Ave is part of the solution, not part of the problem.

20 | Posted by Erik S | Aug 20, 02:42 PM

If there’s any value to this blog, it’s that people can share their experience of what 6th Avenue is—-not what they are led to believe from special interests.

21 | Posted by Mofo from the Hood | Aug 20, 02:44 PM

My experience of 6th Ave is that I go there at least twice a month for dinner or for a stop off for wine and appetizers.

There’s always people on the street. I feel that it’s Tacoma at its best. The stores are open after 5:00, thanks to all those people coming in. I have good food and good fun there every time I go.

Once or twice a year I’ve experienced 6th Ave late at night, due to Jazzbones or Chopsticks and felt safe and secure that so many people were out with me. I find it to be fun, exciting, and also expensive. But I get what I pay for, no question.

I understand that living a block away would be hard and I’ve got no problem with cracking down on illegal activity and puking/peeing in yards.

But the place is awesome and going to keep becoming more awesome.

Let’s get the streetcar running through there soon. That will help get people home safely and reduce the parking crunch

22 | Posted by Erik Hanberg | Aug 20, 02:56 PM

I’m always shocked to hear people complain about parking in Tacoma. I’ve never had to park more than a block or two away from where I was going, be it north or south downtown, 6th Avenue or Proctor. Every vibrant city I’ve ever visited had way, way worse parking than here! And those places were vibrant in part because they didn’t have huge parking garages turning whole city blocks into pedestrian dead zones. Healthy urban neighborhoods demand a move away from the “god given right to park” 10 steps from where you’re going.

23 | Posted by Xerxes | Aug 20, 05:13 PM

The idea of extending parking enforcement to weekends was presented to the Sixth Ave District as part of Shoup’s principles guiding the DMG on parking about 16 months ago.
At that time it was dismissed and the city came in and spent thousands of dollars for parking recommendations similar to those recommended by the DMG many months ago.
Why do we never believe that the answers to our own problems can be solved by people here in
Tacoma.

24 | Posted by Marty | Aug 21, 12:13 AM

I grew up just off 6th ave in the 60’s and 70’s. It wasn’t dead, just more family orientated. It had a few bars, not as many as it has now,but it always had it’s saturday night issues. I think what it needs is what we need over hear on 45th and Yakima. More police!!! This is an issue of visiability and actively cracking down on the after hours street behaviour in the neighborhood. When I was a kid. if we were on the “Ave“after 10pm, the police would stop us and ask us where we were supposed to be or where we were going. This when I was 14-15 yrs old. I dont see the police stopping teens around here or on the “Ave” if they are out after 11;00pm-12;00pm. I think there should be a juvenile curfew.At age 12yrs old should not be out after 11pm unless they are with an adult or someone over the age of 18 yrs old. I have lived in neighborhoods where this actually works. I also feel that the buisness owners need to realize that the safer it is for the people to come too there buisnesses,the better the profits. I dont go to O’Malley’s anymore because they overserve the alcohol to there regulars. It gets really abusive in there at about midnight-1am. It is not safe for me or my husband, who are light drinkers. People get way out of line in some of these establisments and the managment does nothing.What I see is alot of greed as well. More on the line of” Lets’ make hay while the sun shine’s” kind of attitude. It’s sad to see because everytime the “Ave” starts to come back to life (which it has done a few time in the last 40 yrs) the greed of the small-minded buisnesses kills it within 5-6 yrs. high rents are not sustainable in that neighborhood. Too many poor people live just off the “Ave” North and South. I hope that some of the buisness people on the “Ave” read these e-mails. I feel that all of the comments are very thoughtful.

25 | Posted by TacomaMom | Aug 21, 06:36 AM

“by law do you mean the zoning laws?”

By ‘The law’, I am referring to State statutes regarding public nuisances.

RCW 7.48.010
Actionable nuisance defined.

The obstruction of any highway or the closing of the channel of any stream used for boating or rafting logs, lumber or timber, or whatever is injurious to health or indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to essentially interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of the life and property, is a nuisance and the subject of an action for damages and other and further relief.

RCW 7.48.130
Public nuisance defined.

A public nuisance is one which affects equally the rights of an entire community or neighborhood, although the extent of the damage may be unequal.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=7.48

Clearly, the rights of the homeowners to the peaceful use and enjoyment of their homes is being interefered with.

26 | Posted by Steve | Aug 21, 11:09 AM

“Why do we never believe that the answers to our own problems can be solved by people here in
Tacoma.”

YES

27 | Posted by Kristina | Aug 21, 01:36 PM

Nice work Steve.

You must be from out of town.

28 | Posted by Mofo from the Hood | Aug 21, 04:45 PM

I guess we can sue the military for “disturbing the peace” with their cargo jet flyovers. Maybe we should tell the ambulances and fire trucks not to run their sirens on the way to an emergency, because that definitely constitutes something that is “injurious to health or indecent or offensive to the senses.” Sue WSDOT for damaging our hearing within a quarter mile of I-5, sue BNSF for blasting their horns along Dock Street and Ruston Way.

29 | Posted by drizell | Aug 21, 09:54 PM

I went out to dinner with a friend to Asado on sixth ave a couple weeks ago. We almost didn’t get to eat, even though we had reservations. It took 35 minutes for our appetizer and a good hour for our main dishes to arrive. While we were waiting to get in, I checked a couple other restaurants in the area and was told we couldn’t get in at all. We also tried to get a drink at Six Olives for about a half hour before giving up and walking out. It wasn’t any fun. I think there are a lot of Tacoma people who want to go out and just not enough places for them. I live in Seattle and go downtown and to Beltown all the time. It’s lively there, but rarely total chaos like I experienced on Tacoma’s sixth Ave. Maybe some of these people should try going to the narrows bridge end of sixth ave. I hear there are new restaurants and clubs going in there.

30 | Posted by maggie5 | Aug 21, 10:35 PM

I checked a couple other restaurants in the area and was told we couldn’t get in at all. We also tried to get a drink at Six Olives for about a half hour before giving up and walking out. It wasn’t any fun. I think there are a lot of Tacoma people who want to go out and just not enough places for them.

That would seem to be evidence that there still remains a pent up demand for good restaurants in Tacoma. When I moved to Tacoma, there was literally a caravan of people who would drive to Seattle to go to a restaurant.

31 | Posted by Erik B. | Aug 21, 11:00 PM

I laugh at people who are going to equate public trasportation, the military, and emergency vehicals with a bunch of drunks.
The judge is gonna buy that comparison. You just go ahead and try to use it as a defense.
Or, you can ask the clubs and restaurants to tone it down, stop overserving, and start being a little responsible. That likly cures everything. Or are you more interested in protecting the percieved right to vomit on the sidewalk?

As for pent up restaurant demand, Winfield’s and the garage just tanked. Blue Olive came and went and so will woody’s.
There is no demand.

32 | Posted by Steve | Aug 22, 06:58 AM

You couldn’t get served in a half of an hour at Six Olives? Oh, man! That’s really unfortunate in an obvious sense, but encouraging in another. The only time I went there, I got there around 10:30-11:00 on a Friday night. Even though the kitchen was supposed to be open, they gave me and my friend guff about ordering some onion rings. We were the only customers in there, other than some band playing crap jazz in the back. At least that helped to explain why they when asked us to leave so that they could close early.

If even Six Olives is busy, there MUST be unmet demand for food and drink along sixth. Now, to get some bars that don’t feel like Applebees…the new hotdog joint is a good start.

33 | Posted by Erik S | Aug 22, 08:30 AM

Unfair comparisons IMO.

6th ave is an excellent drive by location. Before Chopstix went in, it was obvious. When I drive by Asado and the windows are open, I go home and make a reservation. When I see a line outside of Jazzbones, I wonder what’s going on tonight!

Blue Olive, I only knew about that place because I went to an event at the Glass Museum. Never went in, we didn’t meet the dress code (so no impromptu cocktails at the B.O.). Never thought about the place again, till I heard it was closed.

Winifield’s? Again, never in that area, never thought of it.

If an out of the way place is to survive, they need to get the word out and often. And I’m not talking about the posts on exit133, I mean advertising.

Tacoma is ready!

34 | Posted by Christy | Aug 22, 08:39 AM

What’s the circulation numbers for the Tribune?

Any press is good press…

35 | Posted by Mofo from the Hood | Aug 22, 09:10 AM

On the other end of sixth ave., near the narrows, there are several restaurants and a new nightclub. If I’m ever in Tacoma again, I think I will try this area. There is plenty of parking in this area, too.

36 | Posted by maggie5 | Aug 22, 09:36 AM

What are the new places worth hitting up at the far end of 6th Ave? (other than Carl’s Jr. of course)

I’ve heard that there was some turn over, but have not had a chance to check anything out. I usually don’t venture much past Tacoma Boys. (Don’t tell Dave.)

37 | Posted by DavidS | Aug 22, 02:49 PM

“What are the new places worth hitting up at the far end of 6th Ave? (other than Carl’s Jr. of course)”

There are a few new restaurants, Belle Vita and OPA!

38 | Posted by Jake | Aug 22, 06:46 PM

“It’s lively there, but rarely total chaos like I experienced on Tacoma’s sixth Ave.”

I would hardly characterize Sixth avenue as total chaos and never once have I not been able to find a spot to get a drink or some eats. Finding parking along Sixth ave is easier than just about anywhere in Seattle as well.

39 | Posted by CA | Aug 22, 09:32 PM

Commenting is closed for this article.

#

  • Posted:20. August 2007, 07:42
  • Author: Derek Young
  • Category:
  • Comment Status:Closed

#

#