Proposal To Remove Parking Requirements in the IFSA ( 8. January 2009, 10:58 by Derek Young) ~ Never Enough Parking in Paradise
As we look back over several years of Exit133, parking discussions seem to cause folks to reminisce. Such interest. Such passion. Yet, it’s been a while. Well … parking may be a hot topic for Tacoma in 2009. Let’s begin!
The City of Tacoma has begun circulating revised parking requirements for our newly formed International Financial Services Area. The proposed amendment would state that, “Minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements do not apply within the International Financial Services Area (IFSA); parking provisions must comply with federal and state ADA regulations.” This would apply to both commercial and residential development within the area.
The goal is to decouple parking requirements from private development. Basically, let the market decide how much parking is required.
This proposal at this point only applies to the IFSA – the special area created by city resolution back in June with the intention of creating incentives for financial services companies. Do you remember the boundaries? Imagine the downhill portion of downtown from South 8th to just past South 15th – Matador to Tollefson Plaza. The western border is Broadway. The eastern border is … a cliff.
The proposed changes went before the city Planning Commission last night and the draft was approved to move forward. What does this mean? Well, it’s that time for public comment. The Planning Commission public hearing will be held on February 4th. Expect to see the City Council public hearing sometime in April. I’m sure you’ll have some opinions.
For more information and background, we highly suggest you read Andre Stone’s now classic open letter about parking.
Previously on Exit133 (Search)
Commenting Is Closed
Comments are allowed for two weeks from the posted date. If you want to make a comment or reopen this discussion, please contact us with your request. Thank you for visiting.
Given the state of the economy would anyone want to be connected to something called an “International Financial Services Area”? I think these days we are probably better off having a “Local Soup Kitchen Area”.
1 | Posted by crenshaw sepulveda | Jan 8, 11:09 AM
Nice to see the city is starting to implement the architect’s recommendations and modernize their building code so new developments in Tacoma can look more like Portland, San Francisco and Seattle rather than Federal Way which is currently the case.
Now perhaps the city will allow some of the downtown to infill rather than requiring that every third lot downtown be a surface level parking lot.
Tacoma’s current blighted condition via mandated surface level parking lots:
Parking is cheap in Portland compared to Seattle because you can park on the outskirts of the city and take light rail or streetcar into your destination.
Have I been living in a cave??? Mandated surface level parking by the city of Tacoma??? That can’t be true… is it?? Tell me it’s not so… insanely counter-productive.
5 | Posted by Jesse | Jan 8, 03:45 PM
If we want the city to keep doing good things, we gotta use positive reinforcement.
Kinda like training a dog… if we don’t tell City Council what we want, and then reward them for that behavior, they’ll just keep peeing in the house and getting into the kitchen trash.
7 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 9, 12:27 AM
It looks like many of the large lots that are currently used for off-street parking (such as the Luzon lot, the TAPCO lot and the post office parking) fall within the IFSA. A couple years ago, Mr. Haub pitched an idea for a 14-story building on his property. Over half of the building was a parking garage to meet the MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS of the Tacoma Municipal Code. Perhaps such a building may now actually come to fruition since it will be financially feasible for the first time due the absence of minimum parking requirements.
This amendment is definitely worthy of our support. It’s a good start, but after it passes the fight should continue so that those regulations apply to not only to the wealthiest property owners in town, but smaller landowners with aspirations of developing their property at an urban intensity.
There are undoubtedly numerous readers of Exit133 who wish to develop at an urban density, but are literally strangled by these parking regulations.
8 | Posted by drizell | Jan 9, 09:50 AM
This might also make a great case study for what would be possible if Tacoma removed the parking requirement entirely.
If this first proposal is approved, and we start to see some explosive growth in the area, it would make an excellent case for then removing the requirement for all of Tacoma. Wouldn’t THAT be nice!
Parking in Portland is cheaper because the funds from the parking system remain in the system to improve parking and transit.
In Seattle the funds go into the general fund. So if Seattle needs money (like now) they raise parking tickets and meter rates.
10 | Posted by Marty | Jan 9, 02:40 PM
I highly doubt we’d see explosive growth now even if the parking regulations were removed.
But in 5-10 years when things finally turn around, we could make up for some lost time.
I’d love to see T-Town get a new Tallest during my lifetime.
11 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 9, 08:47 PM
I wish exit 133 would show more initiative… like throw up a petition or something. google docs makes online forms easy!
what can people power accomplish? We prevented the Traveller’s lobotomy over at feed tacoma.
that is all.
12 | Posted by RR Anderson | Jan 9, 09:12 PM
“I wish exit 133 would show more initiative“
The Exit 133 tower on the corner of 13th & A… 113 stories costing a cool (2x)$113 million to build.
13 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 9, 09:54 PM
Those who do not dare to dream big will not achieve big.
————
Of course, there is a fine line between dreaming big and taking out a $600 million construction loan…
15 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 9, 10:28 PM
Just who needs to drive downtown for any financial business within the IFSA that could quickly be done with just an internet connection, telephone, or a quick trip to an outlining business district with the City of Tacoma?
And, just thinking about pay-for-parking in Tacoma everywhere: In Tacoma it has never cost-so-much or took-so-long to drive downtown; as a result, motorists would leave their car at home and use a mass-transit system instead, so paying for parking is not a disincentive to drive downtown anywhere, but an an incentive to shop, visit, and recreate at outlying business district areas and other shopping malls.
Enjoy any new paid parking areas, because I will not visit those areas, so I will let other people support street parking fees that ‘Taxpayers’ paid for the street and the ‘Taxpayers’ might just own many of the off-street parking areas also?
17 | Posted by John Sherman | Jan 11, 04:45 PM
“Just who needs to drive downtown for any financial business within the IFSA that could quickly be done with just an internet connection, telephone, or a quick trip to an outlining business district with the City of Tacoma?“
Some of us (like yours truly) live on Downtown’s doorstep AND like to interact face-to-face with other real-live Homo sapiens.
Old fashioned, yes.
But it’s a way of life I don’t want to give up.
18 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 11, 10:03 PM
“Just who needs to drive downtown for any financial business within the IFSA that could quickly be done with just an internet connection, telephone, or a quick trip to an outlining business district with the City of Tacoma?”
The IFSA is for financial institutions and not necessarily neighborhood banks, as in, your local WAMU branch or something. It’s for headquarters of banks, processing locations, investment companies, etc. Front office stuff.
19 | Posted by Jesse | Jan 11, 10:33 PM
Well, when I banked with WAMU, I went downtown. Now I bank with US Bank and I go downtown. Next month, I plan on opening a savings account with Columbia. You guessed it, I’ll go downtown.
But look at what’s downtown. We have 1 investment bank and 3 commercial banks HQ’d in downtown: Rainier Pacific , Columbia Bank , Bank of Tacoma and of course, good ol’ Russell.
…and these are just the ones I can think of off of the top of my head. Yes, we don’t exactly have a JPMorganChaseWaMU or a CitiCountrywideBank in our ranks, but we have more than most people think.
20 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 11, 10:48 PM
have you considered CREDIT UNIONS? I hear Tapco is less evil than most banks
21 | Posted by RR Anderson | Jan 12, 12:06 AM
How about KeyBank on that list? Don’t know if you know the make-up of Key and/or Bank of Tacoma but Key has a more local “headquarter” than BoT.
CU’s are great if you need a car loan.
23 | Posted by I'm for Change (for tacoma) | Jan 12, 10:06 AM
I was just counting banks that have their corporate headquarters in town. Key Bank is HQ’d in Cleveland.
If we’re talking regional HQ’s, we should add Frontier Bank to the list as well. Possibly Wells Fargo too? I’m not exactly sure on those two.
But regardless, my point was that the IFSA does have more companies than a lot of folk realize. Sure, we don’t have flashy 930 foot towers in the IFSA, but it’s not exactly a ghost town either.
24 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 12, 11:18 AM
For some history related to parking meters, downtowns, property values, transit, cars, and then the ‘Taxpayers’ downtown provides a historical reflective view; an interesting book read is:
Downtown: Its Rise and Fall, 1880-1950
By Robert M. Fogelson
Published by Yale University Press, 2003
ISBN 0300098278, 9780300098273
492 pages
http://books.google.com/books?id=V5wH7qzDnnkC
25 | Posted by John Sherman | Jan 12, 01:31 PM
Well as long as we’re mentioning books, check this one out too. In a nutshell it explains why the burbs are killing our nation… and downtown too.
I read it and found it to be fascinating
26 | Posted by Thorax O'Tool | Jan 12, 04:36 PM
Thus, I proclaim upon the very mountaintops of the Internet:
Hear me, O citizens of Tacoma! Your downtown sucks because of Bonney Lake! Truly, it is the rise of sprawl that has doomed our cities to wilt into the Dust of the Ages.
27 | Posted by Mecha Shiva | Jan 12, 06:17 PM
Commenting is closed for this article.
