Exit133 is about Tacoma

Click!: Worth Keeping Around?

"Is it time to cut the cord on Tacoma's Click! Cable?" That's the question The News Tribune's Sean Robinson asks in a recent article.

TPU has been operating Click! since the late 90s. Back then private cable company TCI, which had a monopoly on cable services in Tacoma, was charging more and providing less to Tacoma customers than customers in Seattle. Tacomans didn't like that, but private competitors weren't showing interest in coming here, so Click! was born as a public entity.

Since then, TCI has been replaced by Comcast as the big private provider. Publicly-owned Click! continues to offer better rates to its customers than Comcast, keeping rates lower in Tacoma than in surrounding areas. It worked like it was supposed to.

But Click! is losing money. The world of cable services providers is not an easy market, even less so now that so many households are dropping cable in favor of internet streaming.

The network was never truly profitable, Robinson writes, but in its early years it was able to cover operating costs. In today's even tougher market, though, retransmission fees for the content that Click! transmits over its network continue to climb, and the small provider is in a tough negotiating position with the big content providers. TPU can afford to cover those losses, but it essentially boils down to Click! services being subsidized by Tacoma Power revenue.

The question is whether that's worth it.

Robinson quotes local officials including Mayor Strickland and TPU Director Bill Gaines pointing to the benefit of competition in the market, which is born out by the lower rates here. They do, however, concede that changes are needed if Click! is to continue to be an asset, rather than a liability.

“What we’re trying to do,” Gaines said, “is find a new business model that preserves the benefits of Click, retains a competitive alternative here in this market both for cable TV and for Internet, but in a way that doesn’t continue to burden the electric power customers.

But how do you get there?

One suggestion from a consultant's report is to start offering retail internet service. Currently Click! sells broadband access wholesale directly to large organizations, and to three local internet service providers (Rainier Connect, Advanced Stream, and Net Venture), who in turn sell it to the consumer. Click! could cut out the middleman and connect homes to the internet itself. That would give the network a larger piece of the growing demand for high speed internet. It would also mean that Click! would be directly in competition with the ISPs it has been working with to this point, likely putting them out of business. 

ISP owners certainly don't want that, and they think that by continuing to work with Click! they can continue to grow the broadband side of the business together, improving profitability for the utility.

Another possibility Robinson raises is the potential hand-off of the cable side of operations to a private operator, while TPU maintains control of the actual fiber optic lines. Or they could cut their losses, and drop Click! altogether.

Gaines isn't ready to commit to any one path, waiting at least until early 2015 when the financial situation will be a little clearer. It sounds like change is on the way, but what that change will be is uncertain.

TPU could get rid of the whole Click! operation, or just the cable side. They could choose to compete in retail internet delivery, or they could continue to work with the ISPs to grow market share that way. Or maybe there's another more creative solution that hasn't been put on the table yet...

Read the full article in The News Tribune here.

Do you want to help the folks at Exit133 pay our bills and keep up with of all things Tacoma? Do you want to see even more coverage? Exit133 has always been free to read and comment, and it will stay that way. However, over the years, readers have contributed to the bank account to help us keep up our coverage of goings-on around town. Contribute and this message disappears!

Support Exit133



If there’s ever a move to sell off Click!, the City Charter requires that the public vote on it.  I don’t see anyone rallying to the cause of selling off infrastructure.

The big loser is cable tv.  It costs too much to maintain.  Click should refocus its efforts on low cost gigabit service, as several have been calling for for a long time.

November 4, 2014 at 1:48 pm / Reply / Quote and reply

2 | 0


Speaking as someone whose electricity comes from Tacoma Power, but who does not have access to Click! (I live outside the city limits), I think subsidization stinks.  If I’m going to help pay for a service, I should have access to that service.

November 4, 2014 at 4:29 pm / Reply / Quote and reply

1 | 0


I’m with the other Chris. To boot, why not offer a streaming TV alternative similar to that of which you can find in other countries? You could sell that TV service for a fraction of what the CATV plant costs (not to mention with 100X the content/channels) and then focus your efforts on improving the network.

November 5, 2014 at 6:16 am / Reply / Quote and reply

1 | 0


I’m with the other Chris. To boot, why not offer a streaming TV alternative similar to that of which you can find in other countries? You could sell that TV service for a fraction of what the CATV plant costs (not to mention with 100X the content/channels) and then focus your efforts on improving the network.

I’ve got news for you. The “CATV plant” also known as the HFC Plant is what carries the high speed internet. Its the cost that the broadcasters now charge for the content that is expensive. IE the stuff you can get free over the air with a big antenna now costs the cable companies many millions per year and that has to be absorbed by the consumers.

November 6, 2014 at 8:36 am / Reply / Quote and reply

0 | 0


The claim is that Click! loses money. So what? Every government service loses money. Streets, parks, police, fire fighters, medic ambulances, and more. The idea is that government provides a service that can only be provided by the group of people to be served. The service is what taxpayers (or rate payers for utilities) agree to spend money to acquire, because we can’t do it individually.

Click! just happens to have a competitor. There are no competitors for streets, roads, police, or firefighters—- or we would see they lose money, too.

November 7, 2014 at 6:24 pm / Reply / Quote and reply

3 | 0

Post A New Comment

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Potentially Related Articles